Use the form below to login to your account. If you have problems contact the helpdesk.
Enter your email address and we will send you a password reset link or need more help?
David Catt of Hometrack looks at the viability of the buy-to-let market as an investor venture in light of ongoing government intervention.
The 1st April saw the introduction of the 3% stamp duty land tax surcharge. The surcharge is part of a range of measures designed to reduce the risk of an overheating market for BTL and tip the delicate housing balance a little towards first-time buyers. This follows on from the announcement of tapered reduction of tax relief for mortgaged investors and the latest consultation on underwriting standards for buy to let mortgages.
So what will be the impact of all these changes on the buy to let mortgage market? As a minimum we expect the changes to usher in a period of consolidation with a plateauing in the run rate of lending volumes on an annual basis, and month on month falls in the near term. There will be less new business written and slower growth in rental supply as some landlords re-size their portfolios to manage their tax liabilities – especially in low yielding markets.
Despite all the gloom, we believe that buying property as an investment, with or without a mortgage, is set to remain an attractive option for investors in the face of poor returns from other assets. The level of yields available in the market, the strength of the underlying cash-flow and the ability to leverage via buy to let mortgages will continue to attract investors into the market, albeit at a slower rate.
The one factor that is most likely to change this outlook is an increase in mortgage rates which will push up debt servicing costs and have knock on impact on investors’ expectations for house price growth. The prospect of a rate rise is some way off but property yields are already starting to decline as house prices rise faster than rents, a trend that has been well established in London for the last 18 months. Falling yields and tightening lending criteria is likely to result in investors moving ‘up the yield curve’ into lower value and potentially riskier property markets.
The greatest downside risk for collateral values is in markets where there may not be a ready supply of prime mortgaged buyers to purchase the property. Localised markets where current pricing levels are driven by investors need to be treated with caution as an upward shift in mortgage rates would impact what investors are prepared to pay for property or can sell for in a hurry.
While the raft of changes aimed at buy to let need time to work their way into market activity the case for investing remains albeit with higher entry and ongoing costs. Given the concentration of rented homes across the country it is crucial that lenders continue to fully assess the collateral risk profile of new originations and consider the differences for how house price sensitivity might vary between buy to let and prime lending at a localised level.
This article first appeared in Mortgage Solutions
Rental growth has varied widely over the last decade from flat to growth of over 45%. Rental affordability is the most stretched in London while in the regions the affordability of renting is the best for a decade.
New Insight paper presents unique analysis of the profile of London house price growth by price segment with commentary on the current outlook.
In the wake of the Brexit vote all eyes are on market data that can provide some sense of direction for what the impact on the housing and mortgage markets will be.
The housing market has been at the centre of a storm in recent years. From rent cuts for housing associations, to extending the Help to Buy scheme, and tax changes aimed at curbing investor demand, all types of organisations have had to react to a plethora of policy changes.