background image

AVMs vs Physical Valuations: What’s Better for Faster Lending Decisions?

Can lenders really speed up approvals without sacrificing accuracy?

 

With decisions in 2025 relying more on technology and data, the choice between an automated valuation model and a traditional inspection matters more than ever.

 

In this guide, we’ll break down the pros and pitfalls of AVM vs physical valuation, drawing on our experience in property assessment and risk management.

 

If you want to understand which approach leads to faster, smarter mortgage approval, read on.

Understanding AVMs and Physical Valuations in Modern Lending

AVMs, or automated valuation models, use property data and algorithms to estimate a home’s value. They pull from big data sources, like recent sales and local market trends, to give a quick property assessment. This makes AVMs popular for digital mortgage processes, especially when speed is key.

Physical valuations involve a qualified surveyor visiting the property in person. They check the condition, unique features, and any issues that might affect value. This hands-on approach can spot things an AVM might miss, but it takes longer and costs more.

Accurate valuations are crucial for lending decisions. We’ve seen lenders frustrated by delays or surprises when valuations are off. Getting it right helps manage risk and keeps the process fair for everyone.

Speed vs Accuracy: Comparing AVM and Physical Valuation Outcomes

AVMs can deliver a property valuation in just a few minutes, which is a real advantage for lenders needing quick lending decisions.

However, physical valuations involve a professional visiting the property, offering a detailed assessment that can spot issues an automated valuation model might miss.

We’ve seen cases where relying only on speed led to missed risks, while focusing only on accuracy slowed down the mortgage approval process and frustrated both lenders and buyers.

The best approach is to balance speed and accuracy. Consider:

  • Using AVMs for straightforward properties or early-stage assessments
  • Choosing physical inspections for complex or high-value properties

This way, lenders can manage risk and keep the process moving efficiently.

How AVMs Accelerate Lending Decisions in 2025

Lenders often feel the pressure to deliver mortgage approvals faster, especially as property markets move quickly. Automated valuation models, or AVMs, help cut down the time it takes to assess property value compared to a physical valuation. 

AVMs are also scalable, making them ideal for high-volume lending environments. They fit neatly into digital mortgage platforms, streamlining the valuation process and supporting compliance.

For lenders looking to modernise their approach, AVMs offer a practical way to speed up lending decisions without sacrificing reliability. Learn more about proptech for mortgage lenders in our dedicated guide.

background image

When Physical Valuations Are Still Essential

Some properties just don’t fit the mould. We often see unique or non-standard homes, like converted barns or listed buildings, where an automated valuation model struggles to capture the true picture. In these cases, a physical inspection is still the best way to get an accurate property assessment.

For high-value or complex transactions, lenders and investors want extra reassurance. A physical valuation helps spot details that digital tools might miss, which can be crucial for risk management and lender compliance. 

Regulations sometimes require a physical appraisal, especially for unusual properties or when the stakes are high.

Common Mistakes Lenders Make with AVMs and Physical Valuations

We often see lenders put too much trust in AVMs for properties that just don’t fit the mould. Unusual homes, listed buildings, or those in rural spots can trip up even the best automated valuation model. It’s frustrating when a deal stalls because the AVM missed something obvious that a physical inspection would have caught.

Another common pitfall is forgetting to refresh AVM data sources. Outdated property data can lead to inaccurate property assessments, which can slow down mortgage approval or even cause compliance headaches. 

Finally, never overlook local valuation regulations. Staying compliant protects both your lending decisions and your reputation.

background image

AVM vs Physical Valuation: Cost Implications for Lenders

Physical property valuations often come with higher direct costs, like fees for surveyors and travel. There are also hidden costs, such as longer valuation turnaround times, which can slow down lending decisions and frustrate both lenders and borrowers. In our experience, these delays can sometimes lead to missed opportunities or extra admin work.

Automated valuation models, or AVMs, offer cost savings and much faster results. However, they do carry some risk if the property data is incomplete or the property is unique.

The key is balancing cost efficiency with risk management, using the right approach for each case. For more on maximising ROI, see our guide on housing market intelligence.

Proptech Innovations Shaping the Future of Property Valuations

Proptech is changing the way we look at avm vs physical valuation. This approach helps balance speed and accuracy, especially for complex or high-value properties.

AI and big data are making property assessment more reliable. They help spot patterns in property data that humans might miss, improving valuation accuracy and risk management. 

Proptech also supports regulatory compliance. Digital records and automated checks make it easier to meet valuation regulations. For more on proptech’s role in real estate, see our guide to proptech.

background image

Choosing the Right Valuation Method for Your Lending Strategy

Selecting between an AVM vs physical valuation depends on your lending goals and the property in question. For straightforward homes in established areas, automated valuation models can speed up lending decisions and keep costs down.

But if you’re dealing with unique properties or complex transactions, a physical inspection often gives more reliable results.

Remember, the best approach often blends technology with human expertise. That’s how we help lenders stay confident and compliant.

Conclusion

Choosing between AVMs and physical valuations is about balancing speed, accuracy, and risk.

We hope this guide has given you clarity and confidence to refine your property valuation strategy.

As the property market evolves, staying informed is key to making smarter lending decisions.

Ready to review your valuation process?

Speak with our experts or explore the latest market intelligence solutions to stay ahead.

Related Content
Housing Market Intelligence
background image

How Site Appraisal Has Changed: PropTech Tools Developers Are Using in 2025

Discover how site appraisal proptech tools help developers make faster, smarter, and more compliant decisions in property development for 2025.

Housing Market Intelligence
background image

PropTech for Developers: How to Align Land, Sales and Finance Teams Around the Same Data

Discover how to align development teams with proptech for seamless collaboration between land, sales, and finance. Boost efficiency and ROI in 2025.

Housing Market Intelligence
background image

Why Lenders Are Doubling Down on PropTech in 2025

Discover why proptech for mortgage lenders is revolutionising lending in 2025. Explore benefits, trends, and strategies to maximize ROI and efficiency.